The Trilattice of Constructive Truth Values
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce an abstract algebraic structure — a lattice defined on a generalized truth value space of constructive logic. For background one can refer to the idea of ‘under-determined’ and ‘over-determined’ valuations (Dunn), a ‘useful four-valued logic’ (Belnap), and the notion of a bilattice (Ginsberg). We consider within one general framework the notions of constructive truth and constructive falsity, as well as the notions of non-constructive truth and non-constructive falsity. All possible combinations of the basic truth values give rise to an interesting ‘16-valued logic’. It appears that these 16 truth values constitute what we call a trilattice — a natural mathematical structure with three partial orderings that represent respectively an increase in information, truth and constructivity. The presentation of the paper is essentially conceptual: the stress is laid on introducing new concepts and structures as well as on their general interpretation.
منابع مشابه
Many-Valued Logic in an Intelligent Tutoring System
This paper describes relations between a trilattice and corresponding meet-distributive lattices. The three meet-distributive lattices illustrate the five information levels, five logical levels and five levels of constructivity respectively. While the trilattice shows connections among the sexteen truth values in general, the three meetdistributive lattices visualize specific information about...
متن کاملThe Logic of Generalized Truth Values and the Logic of Bilattices
This paper sheds light on the relationship between the logic of generalized truth values and the logic of bilattices. It suggests a definite solution to the problem of axiomatizing the truth and falsity consequence relations, |=t and |=f , considered in a language without implication and determined via the truth and falsity orderings on the trilattice SIXTEEN3 (Shramko and Wansing, J Philos Log...
متن کاملHyper-Contradictions, Generalized Truth Values and Logics of Truth and Falsehood
In Philosophical Logic, the Liar Paradox has been used to motivate the introduction of both truth value gaps and truth value gluts. Moreover, in the light of “revenge Liar” arguments, also higherorder combinations of generalized truth values have been suggested to account for so-called hypercontradictions. In the present paper, Graham Priest’s treatment of generalized truth values is scrutinize...
متن کاملMulti-adjoint Fuzzy Logic Programming with Defaults and Constructive Answers
In this paper we present the semantics of RFuzzy, a fuzzy Logic Programming framework that represents truth values using real numbers from the unit interval. RFuzzy provides some useful extensions: default values to represent missing information, and typed arguments to intuitively restrict predicate domains. Together, they allow the system to provide constructive answers when querying for indiv...
متن کاملOn a theory of probabilistic deductive databases
We propose a framework for modeling uncertainty where both belief and doubt can be given independent, first-class status. We adopt probability theory as the mathematical formalism for manipulating uncertainty. An agent can express the uncertainty in her knowledge about a piece of information in the form of a confidence level, consisting of a pair of intervals of probability, one for each of her...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Log. Comput.
دوره 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001